Poetry for Self-Preservation: “Live, I Must” and “No, Not Really, No”

Dr Zhaohui Su shares her poetic approach to engage more deeply with the complexities of medicine and aims to foster a greater sense of empathy and awareness in healthcare.

Photo by Pedro Sanz on Unsplash
Photo by Pedro Sanz on Unsplash. Provided by the author.

Live, I Must

Today of all days

I am afraid

For things and prospects beyond the grasp

Dormant, death, and doom

All options are furthering away from good old hopes

My good old hopes

With thriving remains the unwavering light

Survive, I must

Today of all days

I cut myself some slack

For things and burdens beyond the grasp

Doldrums, dread, and drained

All options are too close to imminent—yet slow—demise

My imminent yet excruciating demise

With trying remains the working instinct

Breathe, I must

Today of all days

I gave myself a pad on the back

For things and cuts beyond the grasp

Dismissed, disrespected, and disserted 

All options are chipping my spirit and drive

My spirit and drive

With fighting remains the undying mindset

Live, I must

Author’s Contextual Note

This poem aims to shed light on the resilient and versatile agency almost all of us have in times of profound life changes, especially when loss, trauma, and grief are the most intense and encroaching. Leveraging recurring motifs of survival, striving, and self-affirmation, the poem hopes to capture the universal human experience that is striving to live with dignity, with a cross-cultural lens that underlines spiritual well-being and social obligations, while upholding individual aspirations. Drawing from traditional Chinese philosophy and teachings, such as Confucianism, which advocates for perseverance in the face of adversity (Tu, 1998; Shek, Yu & Fu, 2013; Xie & Wong, 2020), the poem also sheds light on how these cultural underpinnings can inform individuals’ exploration of mental health and personal strength. To live, after all, is the most innocent yet urgent existential imperative of us all.

Photo by Brigitte Elsner on Unsplash. Provided by the author.

No, Not Really, No

No moving forward

No going back

“This is it”, a seemingly inevitable conclusion at the time

“Stuck has become the new norm”

“No, not really, no”

Life disagreed and retorted loudly enough

With enough humbling ups and downs to make everything more

Be careful what you assume or lose sleep for

You never know what surprises are still in store, even for the struggling you

No letting up

No settling down

“This is it”, a seemingly inevitable conclusion at the time

“Lost has become the new norm”

“No, not really, no”

Life disagreed and retorted loudly enough

With enough luck and serendipity to make stories unlost and retold 

Be careful what you assume or lose sleep for

You never know what surprises are still in store, even for the failing you

No happily ever after

No serenity undisturbed

“This is it”, a seemingly inevitable conclusion at the time

“Fidgety has become the new norm”

“No, not really, no”

Life disagreed and retorted loudly enough

With enough curveball wonders and unexpected smiles met and found

Be careful what you assume or lose sleep for

You never know what surprises are still in store, even for the still improving you

Author’s Contextual Note

This poem aims to examine the complexities embedded in living in the modern world and the unpredictability of life. The poem sets out to explore the prevalent presence of existential despair, which is most pronounced in people caught in the rapid and disruptive challenges of life, like multiple and oftentimes debilitating and dehumanizing diseases. Rooted in philosophical teachings such as Daoism, which endorses the fluid nature of existence and the inherent unpredictability of life’s journey (Miller, 2003; Wei, 2024; Mou & Tieszen, 2013), the poem invites readers to consider how minds and mindsets, such as personal narratives and cultural frames, influence our understanding of crisis and ability to adapt and make change. By analysing the tension between acceptance of one’s circumstances and the agency for renewal, which is epitomized in the repetitions of “No, not really, no”, the poem wishes to highlight the resilience that can be found—if we are willing to try—in each and every one of us, a must-have in life that is not only deemed as a virtuous capability, but also a liberating power by many cultures (Ungar, 2008; Theron & Liebenberg, 2015; Rogers, Bohland & Lawrence, 2020).

Photo by Loic Leray on Unsplash.
Photo by Loic Leray on Unsplash. Provided by the author.

About the Author

Dr. Zhaohui Su is professor at Southeast University and a prolific poet. Her poetry draws on her research expertise in health technologies, mental health, and public policy, positioning her uniquely to provide insightful commentary on contemporary issues affecting society. Dr Su’ works, which often stem from real-world public health problems, aim to illuminate the struggles that hinder both personal growth and advancements in health equity. She believes that through poetry, she can evoke emotions and provoke thoughts that may lead to actionable changes in public health policies and community initiatives.

References

Miller, J. 2003. “Daoism and Nature.” In Nature Across Cultures: Views of Nature and the Environment in Non-Western Cultures, edited by Helaine Selin. Springer: 393-409.

Mou, B., & Tieszen, R. 2013. Constructive Engagement of Analytic and Continental Approaches in Philosophy: From the Vantage Point of Comparative Philosophy. Brill.

Rogers, P., Bohland, J. J., & Lawrence, J. 2020. “Resilience and Values: Global Perspectives on the Values and Worldviews Underpinning the Resilience Concept.” Political Geography 83: 102280.

Shek, D. T. L., Yu, L., & Fu, X. 2013. “Confucian Virtues and Chinese Adolescent Development: A Conceptual Review.” International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health 25(4):335–344.

Theron, L. C., & Liebenberg, L. 2015. “Understanding Cultural Contexts and Their Relationship to Resilience Processes.” In Youth Resilience and Culture: Commonalities and Complexities, edited by L. C. Theron, L. Liebenberg, & M. Ungar. Springer: 23-36.

Tu, W.-M. 1998. “Confucius and Confucianism.” In Confucianism and the Family, edited by Walter H. Slote & George A. De Vos. SUNY: 3-36.

Ungar, M. 2008. “Resilience across Cultures.” The British Journal of Social Work 38(2): 218-235.

Wei, Z. 2024. “Daoist Time and Its Implications for Reconceptualizing the Ecological System Theory.” In Educational Research and the Question(s) of Time, edited by D. R. Cole, M. M. Rafe, & G. Y. A. Yang-Heim. Springer Nature: 463-482.

Xie, Q., & Wong, D. F. K. 2020. “Culturally Sensitive Conceptualization of Resilience: A Multidimensional Model of Chinese Resilience.” Transcultural Psychiatry 58(3), 323-334.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.